Tue
Jun 3 2008
01:59 pm

Critical Thinking is simply the Scientific method applied to life. In this political season, we need to put emotions aside and make a rational decision, but of course it is the nature of politics to prevent rational decisions at all cost. Learning to think critically can be fun, though. Rather than throw out the rules and methods, let's just play some games.

Try this brain teaser...

Three boxes are presented to you. One contains gold, the other two are empty. Each box has imprinted a clue as to its contents again only one message is telling the truth the other two are lying. Which box has the gold.

Box 1...The gold is not here

Box 2...The gold is not here

Box 3...The gold is in the second box

No Guessing...Figure it out

:) Piece of cake--without the carbs!--but I won't spoil it :)

I'm not sure that "critical thinking" and "logical thinking" are quite the same thing. This problem, while fun, requires logical thinking.

Critical thinking might involve (for example) wondering who is claiming that two of the boxes are lying and one is telling the truth, and why.

But I agree with you overall; we do need more of both tyoes of thinking. :)
-- OneTahiti

I figured you would get it, OneT

Let's see who else will post the answer in the comments?

But Critical thinking has several orders. The answer is only the first order and your question would involve the second or third, depending on how you look at it. For the purposes of developing a critical thinking mentality, the question should serve as it is. I think it's the scientific method applied to life that we're trying to develop.

The answer...

Only one statement can be true, so the gold is in either box 1 or box 2. If it were in box 2, statement 1 and statement 3 would be true, so the gold is in box 1.

And OneT, to answer your questions...It is I who states (not claims) that only one statement is true. I did so to try to get folks to think.

Not only that, but there is actually no gold whatsoever in any of these mythical boxes...I lied, just like all the teachers who write text books and make up word problems.

;>)

Now...This one is a bit trickier:

A Race track is one mile long, if a driver goes around once at 30 miles per hour, how fast must he drive in the second lap to average sixty miles per hour over both laps?

Rhetorical

WC,

My questions were samples and only rhetorical, but thanks for reading them anyway. :)

Have fun with your puzzles! :)

-- OneTahiti

Rhetorical

My questions were samples and only rhetorical

Actually, they were interesting from a critical thinking viewpoint, and I only gave one of the valid answers (as you know).

I like these things and get stumped sometimes. It has helped me along the way in problem solving. I guess it taught me to always question my answers.

This sounds familiar

The driver would have to go infinitely fast.

I have had situations where I wish I could do that.

Did you figure that out?

Or did you remember it?

'Splain yourself to us. ;>)

Splanation

The driver's second lap dilemna was familiar, once I figured it out.

Do we get more puzzles?

The political season

Well WC,

Because you pre-empted the question with a reference to the "political season" and "politics", I just assumed no statements were true, all three boxes had lied, and all three boxes had gold...hee.

But seriously, I also figured Box 1. It's more a process of elimination. But maybe it is hard for people to imagine the gold would be in a box that lied when emotions interfere.

There's that higher order

There's that higher order thinking that we're looking for, GH. Well said.

The question then becomes, "Which box is worthy...The one with gold or the one that tells the truth?"

I'm going with truth, myself. It is a rarer commodity than gold.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Eco warriors and politics

Science and stuff

Lost Medicaid Funding

To date, the failure to expand Medicaid / TennCare has cost the State of Tennessee ? in lost federal funding.